From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 19:11:35 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87fytzj6a7.fsf@gmail.com> <87pst2h35e.fsf@gmail.com> <87r7dhxenv.fsf@gmail.com> <1122724400.456845.1155.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE> <8564upv8k1.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85hde7t8n2.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1123111584 30881 80.91.229.2 (3 Aug 2005 23:26:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 23:26:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@suse.de, eliz@gnu.org, gscrivano@gmail.com, ams@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 04 01:26:15 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E0ScK-0002Qb-2r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 01:25:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E0Sen-00010t-0c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2005 19:28:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E0SbQ-0000Sv-8G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2005 19:24:49 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E0SbL-0000P7-DF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2005 19:24:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E0SbK-0000Mb-Ak for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2005 19:24:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1E0Scg-0002ov-Sw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Aug 2005 19:26:06 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1E0SOd-0006bk-3l; Wed, 03 Aug 2005 19:11:35 -0400 Original-To: David Kastrup In-reply-to: <85hde7t8n2.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Wed, 03 Aug 2005 16:09:05 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:41464 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:41464 Well, it _is_ the "system" in "system call": a "system call" clearly passes control to Linux. Actually it calls libc, and then libc invokes the kernel. > It isn't GNU/Linux, but like GNU/Linux, it includes > Linux along with many other programs. Linux is not really a program in the usual sense. It is a program, in the usual sense of the word. You must have some unusual sense of the word in mind.