From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *" Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:09:15 +0900 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1122636571 27359 80.91.229.2 (29 Jul 2005 11:29:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 29 13:29:22 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyT2W-00042v-A6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:28:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyT50-0005Hc-15 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 07:31:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DySme-0008VV-Id for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 07:12:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DySmZ-0008UM-FM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 07:12:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DySmY-0008PR-Ol for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 07:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.47.44.130] (helo=tsukuba.m17n.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1DySvQ-0004sH-6d; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 07:21:12 -0400 Original-Received: from nfs.m17n.org (nfs.m17n.org [192.47.44.7]) by tsukuba.m17n.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id j6TB9I86016294; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:09:18 +0900 Original-Received: from etlken (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) by nfs.m17n.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id j6TB9HCq024889; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:09:17 +0900 Original-Received: from handa by etlken with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DySjr-0006ek-00; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:09:15 +0900 Original-To: Juanma Barranquero In-reply-to: (message from Juanma Barranquero on Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:43:32 +0200) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:41301 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:41301 In article , Juanma Barranquero writes: > On 7/29/05, Kenichi Handa wrote: >> Such a cosmetic change will cause lots of conflicts in >> emacs-unicode branch. Could you please postpone it until >> emacs-unicode is merged? > Sure. > And BTW, when will it be merged? Soon after the 22.1 release? Yes, that is what I heard from Richard ... long ago. --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org