From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:03:32 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87sly54b2s.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <85ek9o40hg.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85mzobzlvk.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1122307617 26270 80.91.229.2 (25 Jul 2005 16:06:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:06:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 25 18:06:48 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dx5Sk-0000Au-3X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:05:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dx5V1-0002ex-0U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:08:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dx5Uh-0002aF-Ho for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:07:55 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dx5Uf-0002YO-3l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:07:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dx5Ue-0002X6-Vk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:07:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dx5bs-0005nu-40 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:15:20 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Dx5QS-0004ce-Ty; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:03:37 -0400 Original-To: David Kastrup In-reply-to: <85mzobzlvk.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:59:27 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:41211 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:41211 Sure. As long as we have code intended to run with XEmacs, calling it anything but code intended to run with XEmacs would be obfuscate. The option we're actually talking about is not obfuscated. (if (featurep 'emacs) ... ...)