From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Is tooltip-mode STANDARD on or off?
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:10:48 -0400
Message-ID: <E1Dx2jI-0008Mp-83@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <42E419BE.4090407@student.lu.se> <uoe8rzscd.fsf@jasonrumney.net>
	<42E42871.5000609@student.lu.se>
	<200507250022.j6P0M0111618@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1122299249 29097 80.91.229.2 (25 Jul 2005 13:47:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:47:29 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se, jasonr@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 25 15:47:27 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dx3IE-0002DJ-2R
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:46:54 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dx3KW-00055A-9y
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:49:16 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dx3JJ-0004h9-Qn
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:48:01 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dx3JI-0004fx-Ck
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:48:00 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dx3AE-0002sf-U6
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:38:38 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dx2uE-0008Jv-Gg
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:22:06 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Dx2jI-0008Mp-83; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:10:48 -0400
Original-To: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
In-reply-to: <200507250022.j6P0M0111618@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from
	Luc Teirlinck on Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:22:00 -0500 (CDT))
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:41207
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:41207

      I
    believe that the intended behavior is exactly opposite and that the
    patch below, which implements the opposite behavior should be installed.

Yes, that's the right fix.  As it happens I made the same fix
after I saw the other message, so it is already installed.
But thanks anyway.