From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:43:04 -0400
Message-ID: <E1Dwrzk-0002vh-AX@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <jwvfyu74yss.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1Dw6NA-000352-UA@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87sly54b2s.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1DwhfX-00026f-3s@fencepost.gnu.org> <85ek9o40hg.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1122256726 25945 80.91.229.2 (25 Jul 2005 01:58:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 01:58:46 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 25 03:58:45 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DwsEZ-0002tz-NE
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 03:58:23 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DwsGq-0006yU-An
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:00:44 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DwsFK-0006X4-Pr
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:59:13 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DwsFC-0006RF-FH
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:59:03 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DwsF9-0006ML-Hj
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:58:59 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DwsAX-0008Vq-2B
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:54:13 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Dwrzk-0002vh-AX; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:43:04 -0400
Original-To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <85ek9o40hg.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on
	Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:44:59 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:41200
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:41200

    Naturally.  (featurep 'xemacs) means "here is an exception for the
    sake of XEmacs".

    We don't have to make exceptions for the sake of Emacs.  We are the
    main line.

That's a valid point.  At the same time, it means that our code is
full of mentions of XEmacs.