From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:41:32 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DwhfY-00026m-Ew@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <jwvfyu74yss.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1Dw6NA-000352-UA@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87sly54b2s.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1122217268 21265 80.91.229.2 (24 Jul 2005 15:01:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:01:08 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 24 17:01:07 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DwhyJ-0000wC-66
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:00:55 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dwi0Y-0005Pl-Dk
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:03:14 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dwhwr-0004Kb-Di
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:59:25 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dwhwj-0004FN-GR
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:59:18 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dwhwf-00044b-Mk
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:59:13 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DwhqB-0000zE-GL
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:52:31 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DwhfY-00026m-Ew; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:41:32 -0400
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <87sly54b2s.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Sat, 23 Jul 2005 14:45:26 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:41184
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:41184

    > Well, it didn't always do the job.
    > This code is needed.

    Could you give at least some example so we can add relevant comments
    explaining the apparent redundancy?

I don't remember what it was, but the bug report was within the past
three weeks.