From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:41:31 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DwhfX-00026f-3s@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <jwvfyu74yss.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1Dw6NA-000352-UA@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87sly54b2s.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1122217318 21362 80.91.229.2 (24 Jul 2005 15:01:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:01:58 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 24 17:01:58 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dwhz4-00010B-MU
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:01:42 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dwi1J-0005gU-Mw
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:04:01 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dwhwt-0004LI-Rp
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:59:28 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dwhwj-0004FU-Hm
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:59:20 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dwhwg-00044b-0M
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:59:14 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DwhqA-0000z8-5d
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:52:30 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DwhfX-00026f-3s; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:41:31 -0400
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <87sly54b2s.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Sat, 23 Jul 2005 14:45:26 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:41185
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:41185

    Why bother.  People already use (featurep 'xemacs) in order to check whether
    they're running on Emacs or XEmacs.  So (featurep 'emacs) would be redundant.

But that way the code always says (featurep 'xemacs).