From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: etc/refcard.tex update. Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 01:17:59 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ekacqlok.fsf@xs4all.nl> <87d5pv4khg.fsf@jurta.org> <87u0j3qzq7.fsf@jurta.org> <87zmsufdx7.fsf@jurta.org> <87wtnwpud9.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1121232635 13311 80.91.229.2 (13 Jul 2005 05:30:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 05:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, lute.kamstra.lists@xs4all.nl, storm@cua.dk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 13 07:30:32 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DsZoW-0005xJ-Kt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 07:29:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DsZnb-0004Ho-Cs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 01:28:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DsZmf-0003vN-8a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 01:27:49 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DsZmV-0003nf-CV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 01:27:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DsZmU-0003kx-OM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 01:27:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DsZnv-0002RI-4s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 01:29:07 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DsZd9-0004pV-QJ; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 01:17:59 -0400 Original-To: Juri Linkov In-reply-to: <87wtnwpud9.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:38:38 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40857 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40857 If there is no room to mention C-M-%, why argue about how to type it on a tty? Anyway, I don't think we need to worry about tty's for this particular thing. If there were room, it would be good enough to say `C-M-%'. It is unfortunate that this non-issue distracted people's attention.