From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Task done? Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 01:35:16 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20050705090041.GA10450@fencepost> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1121063831 29347 80.91.229.2 (11 Jul 2005 06:37:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 06:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 11 08:37:10 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DrruS-0002o7-Tm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 08:36:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Drrw1-0002vU-CG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 02:38:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DrrYF-0005rx-Kw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 02:13:59 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DrrXy-0005kE-Un for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 02:13:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DrrXv-00058R-Oa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 02:13:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Drr6s-0007iC-74 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 01:45:42 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Drqwm-0007hT-CS; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 01:35:16 -0400 Original-To: Miles Bader In-reply-to: <20050705090041.GA10450@fencepost> (message from Miles Bader on Tue, 5 Jul 2005 05:00:41 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40756 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40756 It's not clear what the TODO entry means, so I don't know. longlines and refill do different things, so it seems incorrect to think of longlines as replacing refill; Why do you think that is not correct? To me they seem to be doing the same job, just in different ways.