From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bugs in newly added completion capabilities. Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:45:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200506280227.j5S2Rln23310@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200506290350.j5T3o7c25749@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200506300229.j5U2TrL01627@raven.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1120258246 29569 80.91.229.2 (1 Jul 2005 22:50:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 22:50:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: miles@gnu.org, snogglethorpe@gmail.com, teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 02 00:50:44 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DoUL7-0002Wp-19 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2005 00:50:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DoUTe-0006Ro-6O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:59:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DoUQw-0005Fp-WF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:56:31 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DoUQi-00057K-3e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:56:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DoUQg-00051e-DP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:56:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DoUN9-0007gt-Pb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:52:35 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DoUG7-0002Fl-DV; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:45:19 -0400 Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-reply-to: (storm@cua.dk) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40058 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40058 > I think it's only ambiguous if you used symbols in a _mixed_ list -- > one with both plain symbols and cons-cells with a symbol as their car. > If the elements of the list are consistently one or the other, the > pattern (lambda (arg ...) ...) can never occur. And the lambda always has 3 args in this context, so (lambda nil ...) will never occur. Ok, would people like to implement this?