From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: New dumping problem...
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:45:02 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DoUFq-0002E3-SE@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1DmmJp-0004Ks-QV@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<20050701.012657.123274320.yamato@redhat.com>
	<EAB5E111-217A-4A40-95A4-7E1131A38755@swipnet.se>
	<20050701.192902.40729860.jet@gyve.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1120258192 29456 80.91.229.2 (1 Jul 2005 22:49:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 22:49:52 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: yamaoka@jpl.org, jan.h.d@swipnet.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 02 00:49:43 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DoUK8-0002R5-LC
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2005 00:49:28 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DoUSf-0005pe-N6
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:58:17 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DoUQr-0005DT-9M
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:56:25 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DoUQi-00058d-It
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:56:16 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DoUQh-00051e-He
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:56:15 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DoUMs-0007gD-Rs
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:52:18 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DoUFq-0002E3-SE; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 18:45:02 -0400
Original-To: Masatake YAMATO <jet@gyve.org>
In-reply-to: <20050701.192902.40729860.jet@gyve.org> (message from Masatake
	YAMATO on Fri, 01 Jul 2005 19:29:02 +0900 (JST))
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:40057
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:40057

    The test may pass any linux kernel which has personality system call.
    I guess there is no way to test.

It is easy to test whether that system call exists.
That is what Autoconf is good at.

If that is all we need to test, let's do it.