From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: ?\ vs. ?\s
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:44:20 -0400
Message-ID: <E1Dno6G-0004nD-2y@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <f7ccd24b05062804233bc12ed7@mail.gmail.com>
	<m38y0ufs59.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
	<f7ccd24b050628082870559a3f@mail.gmail.com>
	<f7ccd24b050628090758e1cbc1@mail.gmail.com>
	<m3ekal1s8h.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1120098775 3699 80.91.229.2 (30 Jun 2005 02:32:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 02:32:55 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 30 04:32:48 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dnoqj-0007AW-QT
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 04:32:21 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DnooU-0007ad-NO
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 22:30:02 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dnonl-0007YP-LN
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 22:29:18 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dnonj-0007Wy-58
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 22:29:15 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dnonj-0007Wu-1b
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 22:29:15 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DnoCg-00055F-4J
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:50:58 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Dno6G-0004nD-2y; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:44:20 -0400
Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
In-reply-to: <m3ekal1s8h.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:39923
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:39923

    > Or did you mean: yes to change "?\  ", no to change other "?\ "?
    >
    > Because, after taking a look at it, many or most uses are "?\  ", so
    > it doesn't really pay to change ones and not the others...

    IMO, we should change all of them, but is this really the time?

For fixing minor flaws, now's a fine time.