From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ?\ vs. ?\s Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:58:27 -0400 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1120017558 11956 80.91.229.2 (29 Jun 2005 03:59:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 03:59:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 29 05:59:14 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DnTid-00039d-NQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 05:58:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DnTqc-0001ha-06 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:06:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DnTlX-0007Xq-Ku for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:01:35 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DnTlQ-0007U6-Ei for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:01:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DnTlP-0007SV-Sj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:01:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DnTob-00089A-W0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:04:46 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DnTiV-0006c4-0S; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:58:27 -0400 Original-To: Juanma Barranquero In-reply-to: (message from Juanma Barranquero on Tue, 28 Jun 2005 13:23:15 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:39858 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:39858 Will everyone get the willies, hate my guts and burn little voodoo dolls of yours truly if I replace many/most uses of "? " (as character constant, not end of question followed by space :) and "?\ " with "?\s"? That would be an improvement, but not a major one. There are several recent bug reports that need debugging. If you could debug and fix a few of them, it would contribute more than improving these details.