From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Underlining in compile.el
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:48:01 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DnL7p-00050D-Hq@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1DmDho-0004GG-R4@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m3slz43hsr.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
	<E1DmmJg-0004JF-7p@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<17088.28432.470.506291@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1119985685 13673 80.91.229.2 (28 Jun 2005 19:08:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:08:05 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 28 21:07:58 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DnLPh-0007RJ-1t
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 21:06:29 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DnLXa-0001th-Nq
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:14:38 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DnLM9-0006FK-Iv
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:02:53 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DnLLp-00064m-6Q
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:02:29 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DnLLo-00061L-Pu
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:02:28 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DnLDo-0005rP-EE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:54:13 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DnL7p-00050D-Hq; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:48:01 -0400
Original-To: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
In-reply-to: <17088.28432.470.506291@farnswood.snap.net.nz> (message from Nick
	Roberts on Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:26:39 +1200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:39814
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:39814

    My next preference would be to restrict the area where mouse-1 worked e.g in
    grep just on file and line number while mouse-2 could still work over the
    whole line.  I would not know how to do this, but I am prepared to work on it
    after the release.

This is already the case when I try it.  Do you see something
different?  If so, would you please provide a precise self-contained
test case?