From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: File menu changes (suggestions)
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:46:49 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DnL6f-0004u7-Uh@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <MEEKKIABFKKDFJMPIOEBAELMCLAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
	<E1DmP2N-0006s1-5G@fencepost.gnu.org> <upsu9eyq2.fsf@gnu.org>
	<E1DmmJw-0004Ln-0E@fencepost.gnu.org> <uekaofej2.fsf@gnu.org>
	<q9pvb15tis3f4b3fg6aq8v6i01cg47h68g@4ax.com>
	<42BFFE9C.5060709@student.lu.se> <u64vzfxrj.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1119986083 15825 80.91.229.2 (28 Jun 2005 19:14:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:14:43 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 28 21:14:39 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DnLUm-0000cU-KU
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 21:11:45 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DnLcg-0003pi-36
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:19:54 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DnLTb-0008ET-D0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:10:31 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DnLM3-00069F-MN
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:02:45 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DnLLt-00061L-O9
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:02:33 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DnLCf-0005mo-0J
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:53:01 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DnL6f-0004u7-Uh; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:46:49 -0400
Original-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <u64vzfxrj.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 27
	Jun 2005 20:41:20 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:39820
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:39820

    Except that "Remove Split" doesn't say which split it removes, and
    thus leaves even the meaning of ``remove'' ambiguous.

I see no ambiguity.  It removes the split which exists.
What other split could it remove?