From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: File menu changes (suggestions) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:17:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <42BFFE9C.5060709@student.lu.se> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1119932971 20387 80.91.229.2 (28 Jun 2005 04:29:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 04:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, john@yates-sheets.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 28 06:29:13 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dn7ie-000762-Pn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 06:29:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dn7qQ-0001lo-PS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:37:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dn7pN-0001WD-4v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:36:05 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Dn7pI-0001Rd-1m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dn7pD-0001DS-Gi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:35:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dn7ck-0004WJ-My for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Dn7Wy-0000he-61; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:17:04 -0400 Original-To: Lennart Borgman In-reply-to: <42BFFE9C.5060709@student.lu.se> (message from Lennart Borgman on Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:26:52 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:39728 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:39728 - A window is what we call a frame. "Split Window" would be "Split Frame". - You can only split in two parts. - The two parts contains the same file. In this context "Remove Split" is meaningful and does the opposite of "Split Window". Our "Split Window" operation does split into two parts that show the same file (more generally, same buffer). So "Remove Split" fits well. Both of them are more general than that, but I think users will understand that generalization. "Single Window" also seems like it might be a good name. So it is between those two.