From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: minibuffer and scroll-conservatively
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:16:59 -0400
Message-ID: <E1Dn7Wt-0000h9-VH@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <42B8367C.9040500@soem.dk> <E1DmP26-0006qL-T3@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m3wtogqeiz.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1119933140 20668 80.91.229.2 (28 Jun 2005 04:32:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 04:32:20 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: larsh@soem.dk, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 28 06:32:09 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dn7kx-0007OV-9e
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 06:31:31 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dn7sj-0002qD-8N
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:39:33 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dn7qH-0001oF-95
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:37:01 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dn7pG-0001Si-86
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:35:59 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dn7pF-0001DS-FE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:35:57 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dn7cg-0004W7-Do
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:22:58 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Dn7Wt-0000h9-VH; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:17:00 -0400
Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
In-reply-to: <m3wtogqeiz.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:39730
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:39730

    There are still problems: If I enter M-x ABÅjg, the result is not
    perfect -- but what's the alternative?

Would it be better to lose some height at the top, rather than only at
the bottom?  Currently, I think, g and q cannot be distinguished in
the default font.

In the long run, perhaps the best solution is to allow some extra
space under the minibuffer for the sake of such situations.  But that
can't be done until the Emacs frame height no longer has to be an
integral multiple of the line height.