From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: What holds the release (was: mouse-1-click-follows-link)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:07:33 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DilfB-0003Dx-8l@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <DNEMKBNJBGPAOPIJOOICIEDJCJAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
	<u8y1e0ypk.fsf@jasonrumney.net> <8564wi2ag7.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
	<uoea9gbbc.fsf@jasonrumney.net>
	<f7ccd24b0506131528560b2ab6@mail.gmail.com>
	<17070.36649.525270.871681@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
	<f7ccd24b0506140137713ceeed@mail.gmail.com> <uk6kw61oy.fsf@gnu.org>
	<f7ccd24b050614155445631c70@mail.gmail.com>
	<fc339e4a050614201213aafaff@mail.gmail.com>
	<f7ccd24b05061500367cdefcc2@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1118894805 9044 80.91.229.2 (16 Jun 2005 04:06:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 04:06:45 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: eliz@gnu.org, snogglethorpe@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 16 06:06:36 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DileA-0002F4-Gy
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 06:06:31 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DiljU-0003AR-B8
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:12:00 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DiljK-0003AI-Cy
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:11:50 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DiljJ-0003A2-1C
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:11:50 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dilfd-0001sW-JH
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:08:01 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dilgz-00087d-K7
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:09:25 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DilfB-0003Dx-8l; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:07:33 -0400
Original-To: Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <f7ccd24b05061500367cdefcc2@mail.gmail.com> (message from Juanma
	Barranquero on Wed, 15 Jun 2005 09:36:07 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:38924
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:38924

    I think this strengthens my point: do FOR-RELEASE items have to hold
    the release, even if we don't know who/when will be able to tackle
    them?

Yes.  Thes problems eare important.  We need to solve them, not ignore
them.