From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Should overlays evaporate by default? Conclusion: No!
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 06:54:25 -0400
Message-ID: <E1Dd4O9-0007an-0I@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200505301622.j4UGM33B011060@brains.moreideas.ca>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1117538019 10116 80.91.229.2 (31 May 2005 11:13:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 11:13:39 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 31 13:13:39 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dd4fC-0006ot-IV
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 13:12:03 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dd4kG-0005o7-Rg
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 07:17:16 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dd4jD-0005db-Bx
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 07:16:11 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Dd4jB-0005d1-LQ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 07:16:09 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dd4eQ-0004a7-G3
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 07:11:14 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dd4Qh-0007c9-KA
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 06:57:03 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Dd4O9-0007an-0I; Tue, 31 May 2005 06:54:25 -0400
Original-To: Peter Whaite <emacs@whaite.ca>
In-reply-to: <200505301622.j4UGM33B011060@brains.moreideas.ca> (message from
	Peter Whaite on Mon, 30 May 2005 12:22:03 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37940
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37940

    I'll continue running with the patch, and I will let you know if I see
    more.

Thanks.  Every such case you find this way
is one long debugging session saved.