all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: ihs_4664@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: called by a process filter?
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 21:33:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1DWP3T-0001uV-U8@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3is1oy5vn.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)

    Binding a non-command object (a process) to this-command looks quite
    obscure and unclean to me.

To me it seems natural.  The filter was not run by any user command,
so I'm suggesting the idea that the command that ran the filter code
is the process itself.

    Lots of commands look at this-command (and internally we copy it to
    last-command etc).  I could envision this change breaking code in
    mysterious ways.

If something looks at this-command inside a process filter, it is
probably broken already.  In general it is unpredictable what command
is running, or was just running, when the process filter is called.
So such code would currently get unpredictable results.

It would indeed be safer to use a new variable, though.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-05-13  1:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-11 19:39 called by a process filter? Kevin Rodgers
2005-05-11 20:06 ` Kevin Rodgers
2005-05-11 20:19 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-05-12 16:10   ` Kevin Rodgers
2005-05-13  9:34     ` Kim F. Storm
2005-05-13 17:46       ` Kevin Rodgers
2005-05-13 18:55         ` David Kastrup
2005-05-14  4:07         ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-12 11:16 ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-12 12:40   ` Kim F. Storm
2005-05-12 13:32     ` Stefan Monnier
2005-05-12 13:58       ` Kim F. Storm
2005-05-12 14:37         ` Stefan Monnier
2005-05-12 16:25         ` Kevin Rodgers
2005-05-13  9:31           ` Kim F. Storm
2005-05-13  1:33     ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2005-05-13 10:21       ` Kim F. Storm
2005-05-14  0:25         ` Richard Stallman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1DWP3T-0001uV-U8@fencepost.gnu.org \
    --to=rms@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=ihs_4664@yahoo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.