From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RMAIL slows Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 22:58:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <85ll7m8nbq.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1113620256 24854 80.91.229.2 (16 Apr 2005 02:57:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 02:57:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 16 04:57:34 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DMdUh-0006al-Dy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2005 04:57:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DMdYJ-0003Pc-SP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 23:00:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DMdWu-0002w7-MN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 22:59:33 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DMdWp-0002tP-0q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 22:59:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DMdWo-0002tE-UZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 22:59:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DMdWn-0000ZL-Nh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 22:59:25 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DMdVU-0003Rq-8F; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 22:58:04 -0400 Original-To: bob@rattlesnake.com In-reply-to: (bob@rattlesnake.com) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36037 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36037 It has been cumulative over days. I'll evaluate (garbage-collect) every day for several days and see whether RMAIL deletions slow down. I think you need not bother to test this, because the answer is clear. Emacs certainly collects garbage many times each day. You might try killing the Rmail buffer and visiting the file again, in the old session. Does this make it get fast again?