From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Suggestion: C-x C-u => undo-only
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 02:18:11 -0400
Message-ID: <E1DIKuZ-0001n5-5P@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m3wtrkdbzd.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
	<fc339e4a05040215492d5a142a@mail.gmail.com>
	<87r7hr6ez1.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112641119 4991 80.91.229.2 (4 Apr 2005 18:58:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:58:39 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: miles@gnu.org, snogglethorpe@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 04 20:58:36 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DIWkQ-0007Sj-6V
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 20:56:30 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DIWJA-0006Za-Ez
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:28:20 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DITAv-0003IU-QD
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 11:07:38 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DISwd-0006U3-9T
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 10:52:51 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DISqo-0004QJ-44
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 10:46:50 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DIKwf-0004BW-Uo
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 02:20:22 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DIKuZ-0001n5-5P; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 02:18:11 -0400
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <87r7hr6ez1.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:49:27 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35555
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35555

    Also undo-more can be tought of as "bigger undo" (it takes larger steps
    sometimes to skip over some redo/undo pairs), so it makes sense to bind it
    to a bigger letter.

I don't want to think of it that way.  I do not think we need a key
binding for this command, and certainly don't want to introduce
unpleasant or unusual kinds of keybindings in order to make one.

Let's let this drop.