From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Possible change to startup.el
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:11:15 -0500
Message-ID: <E1DHDV5-0007y7-OA@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1DGlyS-0003Is-00@surf.glug.org> <x5wtrovh5k.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112329066 5529 80.91.229.2 (1 Apr 2005 04:17:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 04:17:46 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ttn@glug.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 01 06:17:43 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DHDZi-0005v8-1s
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 06:16:02 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DHDqX-0003jt-Ao
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:33:25 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DHDnV-0002Kz-T8
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:30:17 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DHDnQ-0002I2-0R
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:30:12 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DHDnO-0002Gw-Nz
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:30:10 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DHDVM-0001Fk-Gr
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:11:32 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DHDV5-0007y7-OA; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:11:15 -0500
Original-To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
In-reply-to: <x5wtrovh5k.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on
	Thu, 31 Mar 2005 01:38:15 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35459
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35459

    In the case of the tutorials, however, I should think by far the most
    efficient way to get this done is by just checking in a first version
    and let the respective speakers of the language then simply do the
    corrections in HEAD.  If some intermediate tutorial version happens to
    use bad words and grammar, this does not impede development at all.
    Certainly takes less developer time than hand-applying and
    corroborating patches.

I agree completely.