From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Possible change to startup.el
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:10:28 -0500
Message-ID: <E1DHDUK-0007rg-GF@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1DGyMS-0003wk-00@surf.glug.org>
	<m33bucnf8j.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112328961 5294 80.91.229.2 (1 Apr 2005 04:16:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 04:16:01 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ttn@glug.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 01 06:15:58 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DHDYR-0005o9-Tm
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 06:14:44 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DHDpH-00032R-8D
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:32:07 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DHDnV-0002LW-AF
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:30:17 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DHDnR-0002Is-QE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:30:14 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DHDnP-0002Gw-Q8
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:30:11 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DHDUb-0001A8-Q1
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:10:45 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DHDUK-0007rg-GF; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:10:28 -0500
Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
In-reply-to: <m33bucnf8j.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35456
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35456

    Why is this _more important_ than reporting sensible menu bindings?

Emacs already reports menu bindings in a sensible way.  This is a
small change in their syntax, not crucial.

By contrast, showing people in their own language that Emacs has a
tutorial for that language could really help them.