From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: which-func-mode again Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:03:56 -0500 Message-ID: References: <13971.217.194.34.123.1112073995.squirrel@wwws.franken.de> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112141603 11794 80.91.229.2 (30 Mar 2005 00:13:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:13:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 30 02:13:22 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DGQou-0001wE-Mf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2005 02:12:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DGR5I-0002m3-Nq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:29:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DGQzi-0001hq-V7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:23:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DGQzX-0001cW-59 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:23:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DGQzV-0001Yn-RQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:23:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DGQgh-0003Iq-5k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:03:59 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DGQge-0003Su-Hl; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:03:56 -0500 Original-To: "Stephan Stahl" In-reply-to: <13971.217.194.34.123.1112073995.squirrel@wwws.franken.de> (stahl@eos.franken.de) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35338 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35338 Richard seemed to think the patch is ok and no one else objected http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-03/msg00185.html ISTR that there was further discussion which suggested this might not be quite the right patch. That is why I didn't install it. However, I have not had time to investigate what would be exactly the right patch. Can you find the further discussion? I think it was just a day or two after you sent that patch.