From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Auto-fill-mode bug: unbreakable space lost
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:25:51 -0500
Message-ID: <E1DFx3n-0004ki-N7@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <qlkacov78aa.fsf@clipper.ens.fr> <d1qd68$7u3$1@sea.gmane.org>
	<m1zmwuo5ba.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<qlkmzsuw4os.fsf@clipper.ens.fr>
	<jwvsm2mkulu.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<qlkmzstutvu.fsf@clipper.ens.fr>
	<m13bulnoaj.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87sm2kpw6z.fsf@jurta.org>
	<200503251723.j2PHNQln009118@beta.mvs.co.il>
	<E1DFOpT-00008X-69@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<fc339e4a05032621343d597653@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112028091 14227 80.91.229.2 (28 Mar 2005 16:41:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:41:31 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: juri@jurta.org, ehud@unix.mvs.co.il, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,
	gaetan.leurent@ens.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 28 18:41:28 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DFxHY-0008BM-0I
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:40:04 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DFxXf-0003AY-O4
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:56:43 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DFxV0-0002BC-Tv
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:53:59 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DFxUl-000271-Ed
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:53:45 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DFxUk-00022Z-QZ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:53:42 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DFx3o-0003cY-CE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:25:52 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DFx3n-0004ki-N7; Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:25:51 -0500
Original-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com, miles@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <fc339e4a05032621343d597653@mail.gmail.com> (message from Miles
	Bader on Sun, 27 Mar 2005 14:34:33 +0900)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35255
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35255

    Why would C-x 8 be obsolete?  What has replaced it?

Input methods, I would have thought.  I am surprised by the idea that
C-x 8 is better.