From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: announcing thaiword.el?
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 22:53:15 -0500
Message-ID: <E1DFOpv-0000BQ-UI@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1DEiWs-0003pT-Qq@fencepost.gnu.org>	<20050325.081838.163323532.wl@gnu.org>	<m1u0mzvldv.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<20050325.232613.73792307.wl@gnu.org>
	<200503260106.KAA20718@etlken.m17n.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1111897132 7462 80.91.229.2 (27 Mar 2005 04:18:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 04:18:52 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 27 06:18:49 2005
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DFPEV-0001q8-DT
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 06:18:40 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DFPUJ-0004XG-VX
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 23:35:00 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DFPLJ-0001TR-OL
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 23:25:41 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DFPL4-0001Mi-Ei
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 23:25:28 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DFPL0-0001J1-Vs
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 23:25:23 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DFOpw-0003R5-Kl
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 22:53:16 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DFOpv-0000BQ-UI; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 22:53:15 -0500
Original-To: Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>
In-reply-to: <200503260106.KAA20718@etlken.m17n.org> (message from Kenichi
	Handa on Sat, 26 Mar 2005 10:06:17 +0900 (JST))
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35224
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35224

The "right" way to handle Thai words would not depend on
the language environment.  It would be based on the characters
themselves, and it would be inside forward-word.

We wouldn't want to install such a change now, but people
could work on implementing it for the Unicode-2 branch.