From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Changes to gdb-ui.el
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:45:15 -0500
Message-ID: <E1DDqFX-0000qI-EL@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <16958.302.32187.274750@farnswood.snap.net.nz>
	<fc339e4a05032121163c2a7a22@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1111524676 2369 80.91.229.2 (22 Mar 2005 20:51:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:51:16 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: nickrob@snap.net.nz, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 22 21:51:15 2005
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DDqIL-00040K-HV
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 21:48:09 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DDqZh-000144-RY
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:06:05 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DDqUq-00045L-Ec
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:01:04 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DDqUj-00040l-QV
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:00:58 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DDqUh-0003wt-Hb
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:00:55 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DDqFY-00075Q-9d
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:45:17 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1DDqFX-0000qI-EL; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:45:15 -0500
Original-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com, miles@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <fc339e4a05032121163c2a7a22@mail.gmail.com> (message from Miles
	Bader on Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:16:31 +0900)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34995
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34995

    One thing I wonder about -- when displaying something in the fringe on
    a graphic display you must :inherit `fringe' to get the background
    correct (otherwise it uses the `default' background); shouldn't
    redisplay merge any face used in the fringe withh the `fringe' face
    during display?

I think that would be more correct.