From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Options menu Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:19:10 -0500 Message-ID: References: <010e01c52c0d$ac93ede0$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <01c52c6d$Blat.v2.4$713e68a0@zahav.net.il> <006901c52c9b$bcf6c890$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <200503201658.j2KGwTm05344@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200503201743.j2KHhwX05566@raven.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1111368733 5571 80.91.229.2 (21 Mar 2005 01:32:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 01:32:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 21 02:32:12 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DDBm1-0004kW-RT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 02:32:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DDC31-0003tu-Q6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:49:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DDC10-0002vJ-1T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:47:34 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DDC0r-0002qg-JJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:47:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DDC0q-0002nE-71 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:47:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DDBZW-0002HD-UR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:19:10 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DDBZW-00054a-Es; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:19:10 -0500 Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-reply-to: <200503201743.j2KHhwX05566@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Sun, 20 Mar 2005 11:43:58 -0600 (CST)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34866 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34866 But the problem here are things like: If nobody objects in the next day or so, I volunteer to install these two changes Yes, exactly. No one should EVER wait less than 2 days for such responses.