From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: fileio.c "#if 0" block
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 00:02:23 -0500
Message-ID: <E1D8ANr-00080O-5q@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1D6xfU-00024s-00@surf.glug.org>
	<E1D7MU5-0002N7-RJ@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<E1D7XnY-0005DV-00@surf.glug.org>
	<E1D7jpG-0005zJ-UI@fencepost.gnu.org> <E1D7kZv-0005t2-00@surf.glug.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1110171598 27858 80.91.229.2 (7 Mar 2005 04:59:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 04:59:58 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 07 05:59:57 2005
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D8AKW-000470-8U
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 05:58:56 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D8AeD-00006U-La
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 00:19:17 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D8Add-0008HR-5q
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 00:18:41 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D8AdS-0008BP-O4
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 00:18:34 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D8AdR-0008A3-1n
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 00:18:29 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D8ANs-0005q8-5i
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 00:02:24 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1D8ANr-00080O-5q; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 00:02:23 -0500
Original-To: ttn@glug.org
In-reply-to: <E1D7kZv-0005t2-00@surf.glug.org> (message from Thien-Thi Nguyen
	on Sun, 06 Mar 2005 02:29:07 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34268
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34268

    i was fretting about whether or not to apply (vms-specific) bugfixes to
    both versions of Fexpand_file_name.  but now i've decided not to bother
    w/ the #if-0'ed version.

That's the right way to deal with it.