From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: decode-coding-string gone awry?
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:12:44 -0500
Message-ID: <E1D28s8-0008T8-Fo@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <x5d5v52k4m.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
	<200502140150.KAA29610@etlken.m17n.org>
	<E1D0w02-0002OD-17@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwvacq56cyt.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<200502171208.VAA09592@etlken.m17n.org>
	<878y5n9vh9.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1108736554 24573 80.91.229.2 (18 Feb 2005 14:22:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:22:34 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 18 15:22:34 2005
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D291U-0003uZ-E9
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:22:24 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D29Hq-000888-GL
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:39:18 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D29Fu-0006cN-6G
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:37:19 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D29Fp-0006Ya-UX
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:37:14 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D29Fp-0006X7-PH
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:37:13 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D28wZ-0004mZ-7h
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:17:19 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1D28s8-0008T8-Fo; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:12:44 -0500
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-reply-to: <878y5n9vh9.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:20:36 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33606
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33606

    I think it should not be considered valid to decode a multibyte string,
    whether the string happens to only contains ASCII (or ASCII+eight-bit-*)
    or not.

But what would it mean, in the other cases?