From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Changed outside --> set, in Customize UI
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:17:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1D02ly-0002li-P7@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FDELKNEBLPKKDCEBEJCBEEPOCLAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>
But we have no choice: _If_ we try to determine _by code_ who is doing
the deciding, then we need some objective criterion (we don't want to
ask the user, about each change that is made, "Did you intend
Why do we need to discuss this question? I thougth we were talking
about a question of advice to programmers. Advice to programmers does
not need to be based on a mechanical distinction.
You seem to agree in general, but you also seem to suggest that the
particular program code could be examined to determine intention - if
it offers the user a choice, then presumably the user is in charge; if
it does not, then the _program is deciding_. Is that what you mean?
That seems to be pretty close to a restatement of what I said.
Whether it is exactly equivalent, I am not sure.
I am overloaded today and your message is too long for me to read.
Sorry, I don't have much time available for this now.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-12 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-07 7:35 Changed outside --> set, in Customize UI Drew Adams
2005-02-07 14:01 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-02-07 18:04 ` Drew Adams
2005-02-07 18:51 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-02-08 20:37 ` Drew Adams
2005-02-08 3:15 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-02-08 4:00 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-02-08 11:55 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-02-10 6:02 ` Richard Stallman
2005-02-08 20:37 ` Drew Adams
2005-02-09 1:38 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-02-09 2:27 ` Drew Adams
2005-02-09 13:29 ` Robert J. Chassell
2005-02-09 1:44 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-02-09 2:07 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-02-09 2:27 ` Drew Adams
2005-02-09 2:45 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-02-09 2:15 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-02-07 16:14 ` Lennart Borgman
2005-02-07 20:51 ` Richard Stallman
2005-02-08 20:38 ` Drew Adams
2005-02-10 6:02 ` Richard Stallman
2005-02-11 21:15 ` Drew Adams
2005-02-11 23:05 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-02-12 19:17 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1D02ly-0002li-P7@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.