From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: customize-rouge output with emacs -q --no-site-file
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 15:51:54 -0500
Message-ID: <E1CyFrO-0006nT-MP@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <00cb01c50ad3$5f978570$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488>
	<010101c50aed$d57b4640$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1107811421 7966 80.91.229.2 (7 Feb 2005 21:23:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:23:41 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 07 22:23:41 2005
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CyGKh-0002YW-I8
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 22:22:11 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CyGYt-0001C5-R6
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 16:36:51 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CyGPg-0004rF-HR
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 16:27:21 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CyGPZ-0004oM-5V
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 16:27:14 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyGPW-0004YK-On
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 16:27:11 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CyFug-0001J9-66
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 15:55:18 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CyFrO-0006nT-MP; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 15:51:54 -0500
Original-To: "Lennart Borgman" <lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se>
In-reply-to: <010101c50aed$d57b4640$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488>
	(lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33050
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33050

    At the moment I can not see any reason not to do this. Should not the values
    just before loading `site-run-file' be the "standard values" for those
    variables?

The "standard value" is not just a value, it is an expression.  So I
think the right way to handle this is to set up the right expression,
one that will compute the value that now gets installed.

This would have to be done one variable at a time, but it is the
way that follows the design principles.