From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Is buffer-flush-undo obsolete?
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 14:13:03 -0500
Message-ID: <E1CwmPX-0002yk-88@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <871xbzyz2d.fsf@xs4all.nl>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1107458465 11737 80.91.229.6 (3 Feb 2005 19:21:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 19:21:05 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 03 20:20:57 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CwmXB-0003Er-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 20:20:57 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CwmkY-0007v7-2x
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 14:34:46 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CwmgL-0005iy-OJ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 14:30:26 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1CwmgI-0005h2-Cd
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 14:30:23 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CwmgH-0005f1-CL
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 14:30:21 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CwmSN-0004J9-Hg
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 14:15:59 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CwmPX-0002yk-88; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 14:13:03 -0500
Original-To: Lute Kamstra <Lute.Kamstra.lists@xs4all.nl>
In-reply-to: <871xbzyz2d.fsf@xs4all.nl> (message from Lute Kamstra on Wed, 02
	Feb 2005 12:35:22 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:32830
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:32830

Yes it is.  Thanks.