From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Ignoring file local-variables in patches?
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:08:04 -0500
Message-ID: <E1CmHRs-0004hr-FU@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <wksm5g93xv.fsf@yahoo.fr>
	<fc339e4a05010416125e42a63c@mail.gmail.com>
	<ilufz1gd436.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1104956265 24551 80.91.229.6 (5 Jan 2005 20:17:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:17:45 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: miles@gnu.org, snogglethorpe@gmail.com, darkman_spam@yahoo.fr,
	emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 05 21:17:33 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CmHb3-0007UJ-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:17:33 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CmHmJ-0007TJ-T3
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:29:11 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CmHju-0006DG-GC
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:26:43 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CmHjr-00069x-Ay
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:26:39 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CmHjr-00069D-1T
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:26:39 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CmHYJ-00087N-S9
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:14:45 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CmHRs-0004hr-FU; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:08:04 -0500
Original-To: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
In-reply-to: <ilufz1gd436.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> (message from Simon
	Josefsson on Wed, 05 Jan 2005 03:03:57 +0100)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31915
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31915

    Proposed solution: Have copyright-update search the next 10 lines
    after the first found copyright line, to see if it can find more
    current copyright headers to update.

It sounds like a good idea to me.