From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Face color changes
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 23:57:39 -0500
Message-ID: <E1Cj9QR-0004rB-VT@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <87fz1srfmt.fsf@jurta.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1104210319 30416 80.91.229.6 (28 Dec 2004 05:05:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 05:05:19 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 28 06:05:13 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Cj9Xl-0002Ue-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 06:05:13 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Cj9ib-0006yD-D2
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:16:25 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Cj9hb-0006cV-Bq
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:15:23 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Cj9hX-0006aC-VR
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:15:20 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cj9hX-0006ZW-1H
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:15:19 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cj9Vx-0007ON-UA
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:03:22 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Cj9QR-0004rB-VT; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 23:57:40 -0500
Original-To: Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org>
In-reply-to: <87fz1srfmt.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Sun, 26
	Dec 2004 21:57:38 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31513
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31513

    It suggests to replace "rosybrown" by "plum4" or "PaleVioletRed4", and

Does anyone want to argue that this change would make things worse?
Does anyone want to argue for one or the other of those two choices?

    "orchid" (for font-lock-builtin-face) by "MediumOrchid3" or "DarkOrchid3".

Same two questions here.