all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: juri@jurta.org, yamaoka@jpl.org, teirllm@dms.auburn.edu,
	emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: undo in loaddefs.el buffer
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:35:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1Cj3Sh-0002DN-DL@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41CFE247.8090409@swipnet.se> (jan.h.d@swipnet.se)

    For the original case (quitting out of the undo question), that would be 
    an improvement as you could continue to hit Ctrl-g until all questions 
    are gone :-).  It is a strange case.  I have to hit Ctrl-g three times 
    for the yes-or-no question in the minibuffer to be canceled, but then a 
    yes-or-no dialog pops up.

I don't follow.  If you type C-g, that should quit the command that is
asking the question, so it won't produce any more undo info and it
won't ask any more questions.

If something other than that happens for you, why does it happen?
Is it a bug?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-12-27 22:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-21 14:14 undo in loaddefs.el buffer Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-21 15:41 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-22  4:31   ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2004-12-22  4:58     ` Katsumi Yamaoka
2004-12-23  0:01     ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-23  0:26       ` David Kastrup
2004-12-25 15:13         ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-24  1:45     ` Juri Linkov
2004-12-24 21:39       ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-26  9:14         ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-27  5:29           ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-27 22:35             ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-24 23:59       ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-25 15:12       ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-26  2:06         ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-26  2:32           ` Juri Linkov
2004-12-26  3:59             ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-27  2:40             ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-27 20:16               ` Juri Linkov
2004-12-28  4:57                 ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-27  4:09             ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-26 16:15           ` Jan D.
2004-12-27  2:31             ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-27 10:21               ` Jan D.
2004-12-27 11:05                 ` Jan D.
2004-12-27 22:35                 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2004-12-28 13:16                   ` Jan D.
2004-12-28 20:57                     ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-29 12:59                       ` Jan D.
2004-12-28  5:03                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-28 17:25                   ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-29  2:07                     ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-29 20:46                       ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-30  1:14                         ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-30 16:43                           ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-31  1:54                             ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-31  9:22                               ` David Kastrup
2004-12-31 15:04                                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-01-01  5:25                                   ` Richard Stallman
2005-01-02 16:02                                     ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-01-03  0:58                                       ` Richard Stallman
2005-01-04  3:07                                         ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-01-04 17:00                                           ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-31  2:14                             ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-30  5:06                     ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-30 20:58                       ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-27 18:05             ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-27 19:33               ` Jan D.
2004-12-28  4:57                 ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-28  8:11                   ` Jan D.
2004-12-28 21:05                 ` Jason Rumney
2004-12-29 23:22                   ` Jan D.
2004-12-27  4:09           ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-27  4:42             ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-26  2:43         ` Juri Linkov
2004-12-27  4:09           ` Richard Stallman
2005-01-04  9:05     ` Juri Linkov
2004-12-21 21:57 ` Kevin Rodgers
2004-12-22  0:17   ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-12-22  0:17 ` Richard Stallman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1Cj3Sh-0002DN-DL@fencepost.gnu.org \
    --to=rms@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=juri@jurta.org \
    --cc=teirllm@dms.auburn.edu \
    --cc=yamaoka@jpl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.