From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Francesco Potorti` <pot@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: `etags' bug?
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:46:01 +0100
Message-ID: <E1CeZTd-0007US-00@pot.isti.cnr.it>
References: <200412092015.16817.pogonyshev@gmx.net>
	<E1CeAIh-00051n-00@pot.isti.cnr.it>
	<200412150457.32970.pogonyshev@gmx.net>
	<je7jnjn1fk.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1103118488 2026 80.91.229.6 (15 Dec 2004 13:48:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 13:48:08 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Paul Pogonyshev <pogonyshev@gmx.net>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 15 14:48:02 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CeZVa-0004DI-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:48:02 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CeZfl-0007qv-Uh
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:58:34 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CeZey-0007fM-7e
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:57:44 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CeZex-0007eO-03
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:57:43 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CeZew-0007e4-Ny
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:57:42 -0500
Original-Received: from [146.48.83.182] (helo=pot.isti.cnr.it)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CeZTk-0003uy-4o
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:46:08 -0500
Original-Received: from pot by pot.isti.cnr.it with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CeZTd-0007US-00; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:46:01 +0100
Original-To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
In-reply-to: <je7jnjn1fk.fsf@sykes.suse.de> (schwab@suse.de)
X-fingerprint: 4B2 6187 5C3 D6B1 2E31  7666 9DF 2DC9 BE21 6115
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31158
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31158

>So far for the theory.  

Ok, I added a couple comments to make this clearer.

>			 Unfortunately a typo during the conversion of
>LONG_OPTIONS from a preprocessing to a compile time constant has broken
>this.  I've installed this patch to fix this:

Wow!  Thank you.  My regression test suite did not cover this case...

Paul, could you please apply Andreas' patch and, if the bug is still
there, get in touch with me?