From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: kmacro.texi
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 21:46:33 -0500
Message-ID: <E1CaPwP-0007qG-Ot@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200411300430.iAU4UdV26748@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<E1CZKgL-0003e3-7c@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m37jo22pfi.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
	<E1CZqj6-0007Tu-Mg@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m3u0r4bx8u.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1102128625 26594 80.91.229.6 (4 Dec 2004 02:50:25 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 02:50:25 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 04 03:50:20 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CaQ04-0005Yl-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 03:50:20 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CaQ9h-00041c-0H
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2004 22:00:17 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CaQ9I-000412-0I
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2004 21:59:52 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CaQ9H-00040b-3x
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2004 21:59:51 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CaQ9G-00040Y-P1
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2004 21:59:51 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CaPzN-0003tt-9L
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2004 21:49:37 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CaPwP-0007qG-Ot; Fri, 03 Dec 2004 21:46:34 -0500
Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
In-reply-to: <m3u0r4bx8u.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:30659
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:30659

    But I would prefer if we just change the defaults (and fix the docs)
    as described above.  Would that be ok?

We have never made a release with this feature, and I'd rather 
we fix it to work using a buffer and its mode before we include
it in a release.