From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: interactive-p and called-interactively-p
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 22:41:47 -0500
Message-ID: <E1Ca4KJ-0005xl-DG@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200412020216.iB22GHc17355@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1102045608 20749 80.91.229.6 (3 Dec 2004 03:46:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 03:46:48 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 03 04:46:45 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Ca4P7-0003zS-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Fri, 03 Dec 2004 04:46:45 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Ca4Yg-0005Kt-Uw
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 22:56:38 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Ca4XW-0004dA-7I
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 22:55:26 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Ca4XU-0004cV-Sd
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 22:55:25 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Ca4XU-0004cD-Oi
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 22:55:24 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Ca4N9-0007EN-JE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 22:44:43 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Ca4KJ-0005xl-DG; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 22:41:47 -0500
Original-To: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
In-reply-to: <200412020216.iB22GHc17355@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from
	Luc Teirlinck on Wed, 1 Dec 2004 20:16:17 -0600 (CST))
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:30626
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:30626

    I know what the difference between interactive-p and
    called-interactively-p is _supposed_ to be.  However is something
    completely escaping me or are these two functions identical except for
    their docstrings?

I must have forgotten to change called-interactively-p after I copied
the code.  I'll fix that.