From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: printing.el again
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:04:00 -0500
Message-ID: <E1CVEzA-00016k-1v@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m14qjtx9fm.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<419779C4.50909@ig.com.br>	<871xew44v1.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<41990B75.1080603@ig.com.br>	<jwvactig7xi.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<41994FFB.2060308@ig.com.br>	<m1mzxiwpnz.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<419C00A6.90905@ig.com.br> <jwvvfc3rumx.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<419D25C5.8080303@ig.com.br>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100894801 9134 80.91.229.6 (19 Nov 2004 20:06:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 20:06:41 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 19 21:06:36 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CVF1f-0003yE-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 21:06:35 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CVFAY-0001HU-QY
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:15:46 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CVF9y-00018E-F0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:15:10 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CVF9x-00017P-7J
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:15:09 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CVF9v-000172-V6
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:15:08 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CVF0Z-0006iJ-L7
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:05:27 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CVEzA-00016k-1v; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:04:00 -0500
Original-To: Vinicius Jose Latorre <viniciusjl@ig.com.br>
In-reply-to: <419D25C5.8080303@ig.com.br> (message from Vinicius Jose Latorre
	on Thu, 18 Nov 2004 20:44:21 -0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:30103
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:30103

    Well, I think it's important to know the optimizations we can SET or not and
    when.

I don't think this is a desirable direction for Emacs development,
The compiler optimizations should "just work", and users don't
need to know about them, so it would be wasteful to describe them
in the manual.

We are aiming to make a release, so please everyone let's not get
distracted by questions like this one.  Please focus your efforts
on correcting bugs.