From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: alarm_signal_handler is called too frequently Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:08:55 -0500 Message-ID: References: <7E7ABFB6-2693-11D9-9BC4-000D93505B76@swipnet.se> <41813425.2010001@swipnet.se> <4181EA7E.2020309@swipnet.se> <4185FC85.70100@swipnet.se> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1099404738 24173 80.91.229.6 (2 Nov 2004 14:12:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 14:12:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 02 15:12:12 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1COzOO-0006Mh-00 for ; Tue, 02 Nov 2004 15:12:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1COzWR-0003sI-K8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:20:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1COzUc-00037V-Ff for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:18:38 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1COzUa-00036p-6h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:18:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1COzUZ-0002tH-UP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:18:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1COzMV-0002KK-1c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:10:15 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1COzLD-0007tm-V8; Tue, 02 Nov 2004 09:08:56 -0500 Original-To: "Jan D." In-reply-to: <4185FC85.70100@swipnet.se> (jan.h.d@swipnet.se) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29327 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29327 I can't say why the do_timer argument is different, the modification was made by you almost 2 years ago: Judging by the date when I made the change, I was probably looking at bug reports saved up from the previous months. I didn't mail the patch to anyone at the time. Perhaps it has to do with y-or-n-p-with-timeout. Can that operate with a dialog? If so, it now won't work correctly; the timeout will be ignored. We could make the timeout work once again using some other mechanism, I guess.