all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: `exec shield' test in configure too strict?
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:57:28 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1CKdRY-0002Uw-5I@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <457CE2D6-22D7-11D9-BDB3-000D93505B76@swipnet.se> (jan.h.d@swipnet.se)

    I have checked in this method now.  I actually have an unexelf.c that 
    works
    with exec-shield on now, but I have only tested it on Fedora Core 2.  It
    is probably too risky to check it in this close to a release.

I think we can.  It should get enough testing.  It's not as if there
were a dozen completely different systems that this had to support.
There is only one, with just a few variants that might raise this case.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-21 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-04  5:53 `exec shield' test in configure too strict? Miles Bader
2004-10-04 15:04 ` Jan D.
2004-10-04 21:20   ` Miles Bader
2004-10-04 21:37     ` Jan D.
2004-10-05 20:40     ` Jan D.
2004-10-05 21:44       ` Stefan Monnier
2004-10-05 22:11         ` Jan D.
2004-10-06  0:18           ` Stefan
2004-10-06  1:34             ` Miles Bader
2004-10-06  7:50               ` Jan D.
2004-10-06  7:56                 ` Miles Bader
2004-10-06 11:31                   ` Jan D.
2004-10-06  7:48             ` Jan D.
2004-10-06 12:58               ` Stefan Monnier
2004-10-06 11:16       ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-10-06 11:38         ` Jan D.
2004-10-07 15:44           ` Camm Maguire
2004-10-07 16:44         ` Richard Stallman
2004-10-07 18:16           ` Jan D.
2004-10-09  1:25             ` Richard Stallman
2004-10-11 10:30               ` Jan D.
2004-10-12  8:56                 ` Richard Stallman
2004-10-20 20:33                   ` Jan D.
2004-10-21 13:57                     ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2004-10-22 21:02                     ` Camm Maguire
2004-10-25 19:05                       ` Jan D.
2004-10-26 20:24                         ` Camm Maguire
2004-10-27 10:48                         ` Richard Stallman
2004-10-27 12:17                           ` Jan D.
2004-11-06 17:00                     ` other unexec problems Camm Maguire
2004-11-09  7:58                       ` Jan D.
2004-10-05 18:04 ` `exec shield' test in configure too strict? Richard Stallman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1CKdRY-0002Uw-5I@fencepost.gnu.org \
    --to=rms@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.