From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [cs-usenet@arcor.de: tex-mode: too many _ (underscores) interpreted as subscripts] Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 11:43:45 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1097336647 3161 80.91.229.6 (9 Oct 2004 15:44:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 15:44:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: angeli@iwi.uni-sb.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 09 17:44:01 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CGJO5-0002V7-00 for ; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 17:44:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CGJUv-0006s8-4X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 11:51:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CGJUn-0006qh-4N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 11:50:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CGJUm-0006pi-2h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 11:50:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CGJUl-0006pX-VP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 11:50:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CGJNp-0000C5-SA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 11:43:45 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CGJNp-0000hM-4t; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 11:43:45 -0400 Original-To: David Kastrup In-reply-to: (message from David Kastrup on Fri, 08 Oct 2004 20:49:29 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28128 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28128 In 2003, Carsten Dominik assigned "all right and title" in texmathp.el to the FSF (for program Emacs), after having previously assigned all past and future changes to it (also for program Emacs). But texmathp.el is not even part of Emacs, whether released or in CVS. As far as I can see, it is only distributed with AUCTeX at the moment. Does that mean that we can change the copyright notice in AUCTeX to be FSF only without Carsten having to sign for AUCTeX specifically? If he signed an assignment that clearly applies to texmathp.el then we should change the copyright notice. We could also put the file into Emacs now if that makes things clearer. Should tex-mode.el be made to rely on texmathp.el if that improves things? if we put it into Emacs then yes tex-mode.el can use it.