From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [jerome.marant@free.fr: Re: Possible help with stable Emacs releases.] Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 10:32:05 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <1096291271.415813c757a26@imp6-q.free.fr> <20040927134714.GA20012@fencepost> <87hdphx91c.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <87655wswkv.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <1096489325.415b196d95987@imp3-q.free.fr> <200409300053.i8U0rWh20758@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <01c4a6f7$Blat.v2.2.2$8c5c2b00@zahav.net.il> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1096813950 7184 80.91.229.6 (3 Oct 2004 14:32:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 14:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jerome.marant@free.fr, schwab@suse.de, eliz@gnu.org, rlb@defaultvalue.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 03 16:32:21 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CE7PQ-0003Qc-00 for ; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 16:32:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CE7Vy-0005Sa-CA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 10:39:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CE7Vq-0005S9-G5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 10:38:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CE7Vp-0005Rp-Su for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 10:38:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CE7Vp-0005Rf-Q1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 10:38:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CE7PC-0000L0-Dy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 10:32:06 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CE7PB-0002jI-60; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 10:32:05 -0400 Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-reply-to: (storm@cua.dk) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27829 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27829 Or simpler: CVS version: 22.0 Pretests: 22.0.1, 22.0.2, ... Initial release: 22.1 Bug fixes: 22.2, 22.3 Minor release = bug fixes Although I like the idea of negative numbers for pretests best, this plan is also simple and clear. We could use it if the other has some kind of problem. That's what I originally wrote and then I switched back to 22.0.50 and 22.0.90 because 22.0 bug reports would otherwise be sent to gnu.emacs.bug rather than to emacs-pretest-bug ;-0 We can easily change the criteria in emacs-pretest-bug for whatever version scheme we use.