From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Comments on display.texi
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:53:44 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1CBwsq-0000A7-6U@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m3fz55nap6.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
	<E1CBddA-0006qR-Vp@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m3zn3c7oln.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1096296920 30806 80.91.229.6 (27 Sep 2004 14:55:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:55:20 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 27 16:55:14 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CBwuI-0006in-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:55:14 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CBx0W-0002ZA-Sk
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:01:40 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CBwzR-0001xe-JA
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:00:33 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CBwzP-0001wD-Kr
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:00:32 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CBwzP-0001vK-9T
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:00:31 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CBwsq-0001a4-KU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:53:44 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CBwsq-0000A7-6U; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 10:53:44 -0400
Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
In-reply-to: <m3zn3c7oln.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27620
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27620

    But even faces have a limit of 21^2-1, so emacs is not without
    arbitrary limits.

    So there must be some limit -- which ?  2^32-1 ?

A limit of 2^21 would be ok, if it is painful to overcome.