From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Comments on text.texi
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:20:19 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1CBddD-0006qk-JF@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <m3brftnads.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1096222868 16392 80.91.229.6 (26 Sep 2004 18:21:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 18:21:08 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 26 20:20:58 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CBddq-0006M0-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 20:20:58 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CBdk2-0002cg-QY
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:27:22 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CBdjr-0002ak-Bh
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:27:11 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CBdjo-0002Za-T5
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:27:09 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CBdjo-0002ZU-OL
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:27:08 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CBddD-0007z5-V3
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:20:20 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CBddD-0006qk-JF; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:20:19 -0400
Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
In-reply-to: <m3brftnads.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27582
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27582

    > @item line-spacing
    > @kindex line-spacing @r{(text property)}
    > A newline can have a @code{line-spacing} text or overlay property
    > that controls the height of the corresponding display line.
    > @c ???  Which display line is "corresponding"?

    The line ended by the newline.

    If the line is continued, only the last display continuation line (the
    one ended by the newline) is affected.

That sounds rather inconsistent to me.  Is this really a useful behavior?