From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [rmail-mbox-branch]: inital problems
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 19:23:00 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1C8S4C-0001KO-DE@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <1095204498.515091.23142.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE>
	<1095355267.414777.7176.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1095463523 25798 80.91.229.6 (17 Sep 2004 23:25:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 23:25:23 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ams@kemisten.nu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 18 01:25:12 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1C8S6K-0003et-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 01:25:12 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1C8SC4-0003Ys-Sy
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 19:31:09 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1C8SA0-0002TL-Th
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 19:29:01 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1C8S9z-0002SZ-EP
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 19:28:59 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C8S9y-0002Ru-ML
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 19:28:58 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C8S4C-00085k-V7
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 19:23:01 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1C8S4C-0001KO-DE; Fri, 17 Sep 2004 19:23:00 -0400
Original-To: "Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@kemisten.nu>
In-reply-to: <1095355267.414777.7176.nullmailer@Update.UU.SE> (ams@kemisten.nu)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27207
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27207

    Okie, here is the next problem, trying to do either rmail-reply,
    rmail-edit-current-message will result in the following error:

    rmail-desc-get-descriptor: Args out of range: [], 0

Could you debug it a little, please?  For instance, send a backtrace?
What bad data causes the problem?