From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Rmail mbox-format branch
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 05:09:57 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1C6QMv-0004ZC-FN@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1C5G9C-0008Hh-Bt@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m1pt4vcz01.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1C5pOs-0007t8-VH@fencepost.gnu.org> <877jr127l6.fsf@emacswiki.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1094980366 22764 80.91.229.6 (12 Sep 2004 09:12:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 09:12:46 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 12 11:12:40 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1C6QPY-0005Ii-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 11:12:40 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1C6QV1-0003k8-ED
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 05:18:19 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1C6QSk-0003AQ-BR
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 05:15:58 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1C6QSi-00039Z-Dr
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 05:15:56 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C6QSi-00039R-2C
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 05:15:56 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C6QMw-00033c-E0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 05:09:58 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1C6QMv-0004ZC-FN; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 05:09:57 -0400
Original-To: Alex Schroeder <alex@emacswiki.org>
In-reply-to: <877jr127l6.fsf@emacswiki.org> (message from Alex Schroeder on
	Fri, 10 Sep 2004 22:27:01 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27037
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27037

    Our problem is that many people use Gnus for their mail.  On #emacs,
    most people recommend to use Gnus when newbies ask for mail within
    Emacs.

The one time I tried to start Gnus (to read news), it was so much
hassle when starting up that I killed it.  I recommend use of Rmail to
read mail.

    Can we look specifically for RMAIL users willing to help us
    test?  We could ask on the newsgroups, for example.  I will ask on
    #emacs...

Thank you.