From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: small Eshell docfix
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 23:53:04 -0400
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1C4tW4-0001WF-R4@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1C1ctW-0006hG-Kn@fencepost.gnu.org> <tju0ukif84.fsf@tiscali.de>
	<E1C2Gmh-0007nc-No@fencepost.gnu.org> <sdd6154u38.fsf@tiscali.de>
	<20040901231417.GD29664@fencepost>
	<m3y8jsc409.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
	<1c4qmgo3l4.fsf@tiscali.de> <m2wtz7gahk.fsf@Majnun.local>
	<01c4943f$Blat.v2.2.2$bd992f80@zahav.net.il>
	<87vfeqqby9.fsf@emacswiki.org>
	<01c4950c$Blat.v2.2.2$553b1ca0@zahav.net.il>
	<87656pbt2x.fsf@emacswiki.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1094615639 6994 80.91.224.253 (8 Sep 2004 03:53:59 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 03:53:59 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 08 05:53:53 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1C4tWr-0007mr-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 05:53:53 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1C4tc6-0004e9-Ux
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2004 23:59:18 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1C4tbx-0004dP-T3
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2004 23:59:10 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1C4tbx-0004d7-Bx
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2004 23:59:09 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C4tbx-0004d3-9B
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2004 23:59:09 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C4tW5-0006O6-Om
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2004 23:53:05 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1C4tW4-0001WF-R4; Tue, 07 Sep 2004 23:53:04 -0400
Original-To: Alex Schroeder <alex@emacswiki.org>
In-reply-to: <87656pbt2x.fsf@emacswiki.org> (message from Alex Schroeder on
	Wed, 08 Sep 2004 00:41:10 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26875
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26875

The main question is simply this: which choice for the variable is
best for eshell users on the GNU system?  Is it * or \?